End the Federal Reserve

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Fed-posts-record-profit-of-apf-231123775.html?x=0

In reading this article reminds me why the constitution was to be followed and when congress was given the duty to regulate currency coined only in gold and silver amongst the states and other nations they passed the duty to a group of collected big bankers in 1913 who control the money of our country and the regulations surrounding them. These bankers allowed themselves to partake in fractional banking which is legally stealing ten times the amount you have. This privately owned corporation owned by banks bailed themselves out while still making a profit through the federal reserve. They charge our government aka the US taxpayers a percent for letting dollars be printed further devaluing the dollar. If congress stayed within the constitution and took this responsibility instead of the far reaching parts of the new deal and healthcare which are not allowed by the constitution maybe those items would cost less for all like they do with everything congress buys costing double and triple what the private sector pays. If we had gold and silver tender as outlined in the constitution we could never run a deficit because it wouldn't be acceptable by other countries. I used to be very mad at China for pegging their currency to ours until I realized why they do. It actually helps us because we owe them so much money it isn't funny and if they floated their money it would double the debt we owe them over night. Instead of 1 trillion we would literally owe them 2 trillion the day after they floated their money. They have a huge stock of Federal Reserve notes and if the federal reserve was abolished our debt would actually lower by a significant percent.

Email to our congress

This should be read and understood by all Americans Democrats,
Republicans, EVERYONE!!

To President Obama and all 535 voting members of the Legislature,

It is now official you are ALL corrupt morons:

The U.S. Post Service was established in 1775.
You have had 234 years to get it right and it is broke.

Social Security was established in 1935.
You have had 74 years to get it right and it is broke.

Fannie Mae was established in 1938.
You have had 71 years to get it right and it is broke.

War on Poverty started in 1964.
You have had 45 years to get it right;
$1 trillion of our money is confiscated each year and transferred
to "the poor" and they only want more.

Medicare and Medicaid were established in 1965.
You have had 44 years to get it right and they are broke.

Freddie Mac was established in 1970.
You have had 39 years to get it right and it is broke.

The Department of Energy was created in 1977 to lessen our dependence
on foreign oil.  It has ballooned to 16,000 employees with a budget of
$24 billion a year and we import more oil than ever before.
You had 32 years to get it right and it is an abysmal failure.

You have FAILED in every "government service" you have shoved down
our throats while overspending our tax dollars
AND YOU WANT AMERICANS TO BELIEVE YOU CAN BE TRUSTED
WITH A GOVERNMENT-RUN HEALTH CARE SYSTEM??

To stay a free nation

I believe our survival as a free nation will be determined by only a few things. 1- Going back to the Constitution and voiding all unconstitutional laws (example any state gun law as it is a federal right in the constitution, as well as federal laws impeding on state rights) 2- returning money to the gold and silver standard as outlined in the constitution and removing the federal reserve who is owned by the big banks and bail themselves out with our money 3- return spending policies to within our means and begin paying down our national debt eventually lowering taxes as the burden is lowered 4- reduce or abolish the nanny state and the police state that has been created these past 35 years further back if you count SS and things like that 5- Stop warring for the sake of warring our young people deserve better than that. 6- Make equal trade among the entire world with the United States (if China won't let us sell products made here hey free and equal, if Japan wants to limit the number of US cars coming into their country, hey we can accommodate that too)

Side notes, if you give up your rights to the government for the "terrorists" then A the terrorists win and B the government are now the terrorists. Healthcare, schooling, are luxuries and everyone should pay their fair share to get those benefits or they should not get them. No more giving to the poor and no more giving to corporations, everyone must earn their fair share through productivity or our country will fold with the deficits we run every month. AKA our yearly deficit is higher than the GDP of all but 7 countries in the entire world.

Judge Andrew Napolitano Natural rights

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7n2m-X7OIuY

This is a powerful video take the time to watch (this is 3 of 3 so watch them all)

Fair.

From the left I always hear about wanting things to be fair. I have decided to agree with them for a change and see if they want fair. I want fair. I want things in life to be just. So here is my proposal of fair. When it comes to social issues such as healthcare and welfare I ask that my liberal friends instead of having our government pay these things through taxes and corruption, why don't you cut out the middle man and help those in need yourselves as most right leaning people already do through giving money to churches, helping out charities or individuals. In regards to healthcare those who want social medicine can you please pony up the 250k+ and 8-12 years for medical school and then volunteer your time to help others. When it comes to taxes our government typically spends about 2.5 trillion dollars if we paid our fair share than each person would owe 8333 dollars per year therefore a family of 4 would owe 33,333 in taxes. Now when you add in that over 20% of the population pays no federal income tax that rises quite a bit. But hold on there is more that 20% actually gets paid. Take away that pay and yes you guessed it that 8333 per person goes down as .5 trillion is paid out to these 20%. So now paying for 2 trillion people will owe 6666 per person or 26,666 for a family of 4. Do you think people living in poverty would pop out 5 kids if they had to pay 8333 for each if things were fair? Do you think they would pop out 5 kids if they didn't get paid 500,000,000,000 dollars each year from our tax dollars to feed those children and had to pay over 40,000 in taxes each year for their fair share? The left speaks of Darwins theory of survival of the fittest, why don't they allow this to work in the market place. The weak will fall be the wayside at their own lack of ambition this is American the land of opportunity and should not be the land of free hand outs to the lazy and unmotivated. I want fair, why should a business pay 36% tax and a person on the corner get paid to live? If that business was paying a measly communist China rate of 25% then that person would have a job to work instead of the business paying it to the government and allowing that person to stay unproductive. I think we need fair. My question is why does income matter when it comes to fair. Under the socialistic plans the left strives for each should pay their own fair share. I see people created equal, but I don't always see them end up equal. I see a lot of people rise to the occasion no matter where they come from or what their parents did. I see a lot of people come from lots and end up with little. It is time each person be responsible for them self and lower the tax burden on the masses. The social path that we have been following will lead to poverty for all not just the few. Socialism is the sharing of poverty when other people's money runs out.

Government Spending

http://www.downsizedc.org/blog/can-we-afford-more-deficit-spending

Government spending will lead to the demise of the United States unless it is curbed greatly. Over the past 15 years we have seen a republican congress actually be productive having a surplus at the end of the Clinton administration as there was a supposed check and balance between the two. Once Bush came into power that check was removed and the republicans spend money worse than the democrats. The unconstitutional power transferred to the government during his dictatorship was out of whack and took too many civil rights from the American people. Bush spoke of fighting for freedom while taking our freedoms away. Through that horrid time in American history he put in place the Unpatriot Act which was written prior to the events of 9/11. This is corrupt and the Supreme Court should have struck it down as Unconstitutional as it is. During that period Bush installed more and more government agencies that violated American rights at their own expense. At the displeasure of Bush republicans and their failing small government, no deficit values were voted out of government in masses and in with the tax and spend democrats. Taxes on employers are now going up in a time that taxes on employers should be going down to spark hiring, which is possibly worst possible thing that could be done in this economy. The failed Bush policies that cost the American tax payer and the borrowing tons of money from China and Japan for issues such as the wars which are unjust, the bailouts to corporate America, the taking away of American civil rights, are all being multiplied by the Obama administration. All Americans from both parties who were mad at Bush need to evaluate what Obama is doing. He is increasing the bailout to corporate America, increased the wars, decreased civil rights, increased the tax burden, is attempting to add a healthcare bill which will cost middle and upper America 870+ billion dollars and will put mandates on Americans who could face fines or jail time if they do not comply. We are Americans nobody requires us to do anything and it is time to remove 3/4 of the regulations that are unconstitutional. Obama also has gone outside of the government to Copenhagen to offer hundreds of billions and possibly up to 2 trillion American tax dollars to other countries in which they don't even know how to use the money to fight "global warming". Entitlements need to be done away with in all forms to sustain our country in a positive manner or our dollar will be finished and our freedoms will be squashed through inflation. The more socialist we become the more our rights will be taken away, the more impoverished we all become. To help the few the many will be taken down. It is time that the hard working and positive members of society were rewarded and not the unmotivated and unskilled. It is time we spent within our means and removed the hinderances to prosperity.

The bill of rights and their meanings.

The Amendments

The following are the Amendments to the Constitution. The first ten Amendments collectively are commonly known as the Bill of Rights. History

---

Amendment 1 - Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression.Ratified 12/15/1791.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

This is the separation of Church and State. Congress cannot limit religion or people's exercise of it. This is a one way separation in that Congress cannot limit religion or establish one, this is not a limit on religious ideals being part of congress in it's decisions. Congress cannot limit free speech, press or peaceable assembly. The people shall be allowed to petition.

---

Amendment 2 - Right to Bear Arms. Ratified 12/15/1791.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The right of each American is to be able to own and operate weapons and that right without limits shall not be infringed. This means state and local gun laws are void by the constitution as we have seen recently in DC.

---

Amendment 3 - Quartering of Soldiers. Ratified 12/15/1791.

No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

The government cannot have soldiers sleep in your house without your consent at any time.

---

Amendment 4 - Search and Seizure. Ratified 12/15/1791.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

This is a right that has been given away with the Patriot Act. Therefore the Patriot Act is unconstitutional and should be voided. (This latest bombing on the plane issue alone shows the Patriot Act is useless to begin with and needs to removed) Warrants are needed for search and this includes your car when pulled over for a traffic stop. Speeding is not just cause for a car search.

---

Amendment 5 - Trial and Punishment, Compensation for Takings. Ratified 12/15/1791.

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

This right protects the innocent. This gives a citizen rights when accused of a crime and cannot be tried twice for the same offense. This also protects property rights for individuals. Land, houses or any other private property cannot be taken away from you by the government without being paid fair market value for it.

---

Amendment 6 - Right to Speedy Trial, Confrontation of Witnesses. Ratified 12/15/1791.

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

This law allows for a citizen to have a timely trial if accused of a crime. The accused member has the right to have assistance by Counsel in obtaining witnesses and to confront those who are accusing the citizen of the crime. This sets the standard for public trials by jury in the local demographic area.

---

Amendment 7 - Trial by Jury in Civil Cases. Ratified12/15/1791.

In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

This amendment separates the Civil cases from the criminal cases.

---

Amendment 8 - Cruel and Unusual Punishment. Ratified12/15/1791.

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

Bail/fines shall not be excessive which is quite a vague expression as well as cruel and unusual punishments. I would consider fines large companies of hundreds of millions of dollars an excessive penalty. Apparently our government and judicial system does not. Cruel and unusual punishments. If a man kills three or more people with witnesses and proved beyond doubt is it cruel or unusual to remove him from society by death? Is it not a improvement to society to remove serial killers (especially ones who plead insanity) from the gene pool? (on topic question... why does it seem like those who are against the death penalty are for abortion? how is killing an innocent baby a more acceptable practice than putting a killer to death?)

---

Amendment 9 - Construction of Constitution. Ratified12/15/1791.

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

This says these are the rights of the people, but we are not limited to just these rights alone.

---

Amendment 10 - Powers of the States and People. Ratified12/15/1791.

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

This states that each state has the power the way they see fit as long as it does not go against the rights proposed in the constitution. For example all state laws against guns are voided by this constitution as that is a right granted for all citizens.

---